Monday, October 3, 2011

When and How to Deconstruct


     In chapter two of Salingaros' "Anti-Architecture and Deconstruction", he states the following, "From the monumentality of the buildings of ancient civilization, to the decorative details present in all vernacular architectures, the human spirit expresses itself creatively in the constructed realm. The man-made world represents our spirit, our mind and our hear - theses are reflected in our buildings". Salingaros goes on to contrast this by stating, "Deconstructionist architecture presents us with the vision of a world destroyed, of a universe reduced to fragments." Harsh words one might expect from the title of his book.

    This hits at home in what my design philosophy is - one of synthesis and interrelations, rather than reduced fractals. While for the most part I would agree with Salingaros, I believe there are times deconstruction can work. To prove how it may work, and how it mostly doesn't work, I've included two examples of Frank Gehry's work.                                                                               
The experience music project in Seatle (Wikipedia)
      In my eyes, the experience music project looks like a transformer relieved itself in Seattle. It is in no way  in relation to the whole. It makes me somewhat nervous.

Dancing House in Progue (Wikipedia)



      For some reason, however, the Dancing house does it for me. It reminds me of Gaudi's work in a way. Because of the adjacent traditional architecture, the abstraction isn't alone. It is composed within its surroundings and provides a nice contrast to the normal. This building resembles a building, and yet it is unlike any other building that I have ever seen. Does anyone else like this, or did I just read too much Dr. Zeus growing up?

Thoughts on Intentional Communities

     In class we were subjected to the benefits and horrors of intentional communities through a documentary called "Visions of Utopia". The spectrum of intentional communities contains various hues, in that on the one hand a golf course community is an intentional community, and on the other hand we see a communal lifestyle within an ecovillage. The common thread is a shared vision. Instead of regurgitating thoughts already discussed in class, I will briefly speak on my two experiences living in intentional communities.

Living Learning Center - Boone, NC

     My first experience in an intentional community was at Watauga College, now called Watauga Global Community, at Appalachian State University. Watauga is an interdisciplinary honors program at ASU, and its headquarters where I lived my freshman year, is called the Living Learning Center (affectionately known as the LLC).


Living Learning Center (http://housing.appstate.edu/pagesmith/111)







     This place was awesome. Imagine a fraternity and sorority of around 100 people living, eating, and studying together. I can't tell you how many times intense conversation poured out of those doors and onto the courtyard. For our core classes, we often met in each floor's kitchen / gathering areas. At our own cafeteria, we ate alongside other students and faculty. In the foreground, the early working of an edible schoolyard are at work. I gained a great deal from this community., but it wasn't without its problems. Some students were upset about the fact that three times a week they were forced to eat their meal at the LLC. In all communities, there is a personal sacrifice of freedoms. In this case, I was more than willing to limit my lunch options in order to have a dining facility where I lived and learned.

Earthaven Ecovillage - Asheville, NC

     My second experience with intentional communities was certainly different,  although at times very similar to the LLC - something about the hora surrounding a group of hip minded individuals. I went to Earthaven Ecovillage, outside of Asheville, NC, to participate in a live/work internship at Medicine Wheel Collective Household. (Note the sweet solar golf cart that went 2mph)

                                                                                 The Medicine Wheel                                                                                                     (http://www.otherfamily.net/gallery2/v/users/Swiftness/Earthaven/Sara/009+Medicine+Wheel+house.JPG.html)
       I wanted to learn permaculture, and I thought I knew what that would entail.. I was searching for this "knowledge" of permaculture  that would enable me to produce food using the most sustainable methods available today. Although I knew permaculture was more than a just a gardening technique, I had no idea how much more it was simply a way of living. I say I couldn't live like that, yet I have found myself reflecting on my experience at least weekly since I left. It wasn't the green technologies or the sustainable farming practices I fell in love with there, it was the people.
   
      It was the dinners we shared, how I helped Rudy to mill wood for the construction of his new house or helped Patricia build her Cobb house. It was nightly tea with the Brits Nick and Mira, getting philosophical with Lyndon, utilizing some of River Otter's herbal remedies for poison ivy, or taking a break from building a stone patio with Mellisa  to get a chilled watermelon out of the creek that I enjoyed so much.

Conclusions
 
     What's LA's role within the realm of intentional communities. I see two opportunities at hand, our role as designers and our role as organizers. Within these roles lies the physical form, the creation of community, and the interrelations between them.

     In terms of the physical form, building materials, greywater systems, and renewable energy are at the forefront. At times, their aesthetics and preconceptions limit their application. As designers, we can use a different facade and a different name. I believe that in doing so they can be highly successful in a market full of people searching to live more sustainably. For example, the pictures below contrast earlier cob houses at Earthaven with the newest edition, "Leela".

                                                                                                      Leela                                                                                                        (http://www.mycobhouse.com/2011/04/23/pictures-from-earthaven-eco-village-tour/)


                                                                                                    Hut Hamlet                                                                                              (http://www.otherfamily.net/gallery2/v/users/Swiftness/Earthaven/Sara/008+Hut+Hamlet+neighborhood.JPG.html)                                                                                                                                          
 I would feel a lot more confident selling a client on "Leela" than a home from the Hut Hamlet because of sheer aesthetics. "Leela" is beautiful.


      The second group of elements go hand in hand with community building. Community gardens and kitchens, for example, are easy to propose but require a physical investment from community members. These elements come back to the shared vision of the community, and these pieces must be desired to work. Even at Serenbe, an agricultural community with a CSA farm on site, the citizens have yet to gain enough interest for a community garden. Our role is a lot harder when it comes to these elements because if we build it they may actually not come. Here we leave the role as designers and become community organizers through the charrette process. This process is uglier than our pretty pictures, but the implications are huge. This is where a rich community is conceived.

So what can we take from all this? I would ask you what is your utopia? I bet other people share a similar vision. Find them. Create it. If you don't want to put all of your hard earned money into a pot, don't! This is your vision of utopia. It can be whatever you want it to be, and that's the beauty of it.

Sunday, September 18, 2011

How Sustainable Should We Build?

How sustainable should the communities we design be built? Personally, I oscillate between new urbanist and ecovillage philosophies depending on the mood of the day.

If one is optimistic, then new urbanist solutions are optimal designs for a consumption based economy we have had in the past and will continue to have. We will be able to get a hold of, and self regulate the amount of consumption our society demands. We will eventually reach carrying capacity (if we haven't already), realize what we need to do to survive, and execute a proper plan. In this scenario, I see providing communities that are only say 50% or 75% "sustainable" as a huge optimistic leap forward. New urbanism is applicable to the masses, and if nationwide we reduced our ecological footprint by 50% while encouraging a healthy society at the same time then it may work. Life as we know it would not be that drastically different a hundred years from now as it is today.

If one is pessimistic, then new urbanist solutions are futile and too reliant on an outside and far reaching economy to survive. War, peak oil, nuclear and societal meltdowns are causing fear to permeate throughout our society. The pessimist has lost hope in the far reaching network to provide essential needs to survive and decides to get extremely local. The pessimist retreats from the urban core to find refuge in wilderness. They look toward nature to provide for food, water, and shelter. The ecovillager trades all the good that urbansim can provide for securtiy, sustainablity, and sustenance.

So is it sunny or raining? Maybe the answer is both, (think rainbows). I find myself wanting both. I want an urban live/work unit, and I also want a rural homestead. What do you want? What do you think? Do we do a disservice as professionals by not designing for a limited few at 100% sustainable (whatever that may be), or should we attempt to get as many people as possible to live at a lesser degree of sustainability?

Friday, September 2, 2011

Transformer Buildings


In How Buildings Learn, Stewart Brand has engaged our thinking about how buildings change over time. Whereas what we have been talking about in class deals with renovations every decade or two, this example of a theater designed by Joshua-Prince-Ramus can change within a matter of hours. The theater itself can morph into whatever is demanded of it. I encourage you all to check out this ted talk.

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Chipotle - Back to the Start

So Chipotle still has a long way to go, but at least they are a few strides above other chain restaurants. This is a pretty cool video.

Monday, August 29, 2011

Raw Milk, SWAT Teams, and Your Freedom

The local food movement has taken root and is steadily growing. Part of this movement is focused on  raw products which have more nutrients, bacteria, and/or enzymes our bodies need. For example, raw milk contains the enzyme "lactase" which breaks down "lactose". It's kind of one of those things nature has provided us for free. To be clear there are some risks with raw products, but if handled correctly these risks are minimized.

Highly industrialized food systems try to minimize these risks as well, however, in doing so they also minimize the nutritional benefits. In the past month alone, we have seen 36 million pounds of ground turkey, 60,000 pounds of ground beef, and 8,000 pounds of smoked salmon recalled. Simply put, the claims of a safer food through industrialization aren't being realized. Here are the links to these outbreaks:

http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2011/08/03/36-million-pounds-of-ground-turkey-recalled-after-salmonella-outbreak/?iref=allsearch
http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/15/ground-beef-recalled-on-e-coli-concerns/?iref=allsearch
http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/08/27/salmon.recall/index.html?iref=allsearch

What is crazy here is that raw milk is actually illegal. Food policy around the subject is not favorable for small farmers, or communities. This has huge implications for the most recent form of New Urbanism, called Agrarian Urbanism. Quite simply, Agrarian Urbanism is illegall. Maybe this is part of the reason we haven't seen an Agrarian Urbanism site yet.

The following is a link to a story and short video clip of a raid in CA. A SWAT team was brought in to shut down a small market selling raw food. This isn't the first time raids have happened, but really? A SWAT team? The owner's bail has been set at $125,000, which according to the story is more than a rapist in LA.


http://wholenewmom.com/reaching-out/swat-team-invades-raw-milk-farm-arrests-3-dumps-safe-milk/

Solar Sprawl and Agrivoltaics

We kicked the class off with a slideshow of sprawl. Here's another picture to jog our memory.
http://asifpeoplemattered.wordpress.com/2011/07/07/sprawl/sprawl-2/

I have had solar power on my mind lately because of the movement here on campus to start a green fund. Here is one of the "latest and greatest" solar projects out of Chicago.
http://www.illinoissolar.org/events?eventId=198024&EventViewMode=EventDetails

http://www.illinoissolar.org/events?eventId=198024&EventViewMode=EventDetails
Now, to this project's credit the solar panels were placed on top of a brownfield. Instead of remediating the brownfield, a solar plant was installed. Solar plants of this scale are encouraged as a "sustainable" alternative to fossil fuels, but this plant doesn't look like what I imagined "sustainable" to be. It serves only one purpuse, to generate power.

What other functions do solar panels have? I started thinking about the opportunity for an agirculture/photovoltaic intercrop where the solar panels could provide shade to certain shade loving species. After some time of researching, I found this.

http://wcca2011.org/news/Issue4.html
Behold, an agrivoltaic system. The first of these systems has just been built in Montipellier, France. Preliminary modeling shows an increase in overall efficiency of land use. The researchers will produce findings after a three year study. For more information, look at C. Dupraz, et. al. (2011), Combining Solar Photovoltaic Panels and Food Crops for Optimising Land Use: Towards New Agrivoltaic Schemes,out of Renewable Energy.